Free web hosting user's review posts are 4,610 posts.
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by firstname.lastname@example.org, IP 172.158.0.X, When 05 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
what a great host !!! A++
1FreeWeb [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Johnny, IP 194.135.105.X, When 04 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
sign up page all worked, morons you just don't know how to use your computer, LOL
HostBot [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Azonic, IP 98.21.1.X, When 04 Sep 08 : Rated= 1
There is a forced advertisement on the bottom of your page. And sometimes that advertisement is HUUUGE!
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by vaquerito, IP 189.191.55.X, When 04 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
the best free hosting that I have seen, Im running a SMF forum and had no problem at all°°°
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by email@example.com, IP 84.67.57.X, When 04 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
Great, the 6gb transfer per month will not hinder most users, imageshack is good for those who use a large amount of this.
I choose lead hoster because it has no limits that are likely to effect me, 250mb storage and 6gb transfer per month. I actually signed up to some sort of partner company who redirected my service to lead hoster and I found that there are many sub-companies with different limits which run off lead hoster. For the best service I suggest you sign up with lead hoster directly, as I did the second time around.
Due to the advanced level of this service, I found it confusing at the beginning as I did not know what the URL of my site would be. I soon found that out after realizing that lead hoster sub-contract their hosting to another company who manages things.
To improve ease of use for new customers leadhoster should reduce the amount of sub-companies and websites, as that gets confusing and you don't really know who you have an account with.
But after you get started, it is an excellent service which offers many advanced features such as SSI which I needed in order to make my website more easily maintainable.
700Megs [FI](Inactive) reviewed by firstname.lastname@example.org, IP 75.216.242.X, When 03 Sep 08 : Rated= 3
Site worked great at first. It has now been down or virtually useless since Aug 24. Good communications at first,then nothing. You get what you pay for.
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by email@example.com, IP 189.7.67.X, When 03 Sep 08 : Rated= 7
I like LeadHoster but since 1 month my site is offline, the IP
was chance and I was in trouble... I don't know why they did it
ClampHost [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Alessandro, IP 82.53.135.X, When 03 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
they have a great immediately support...
i just ask to leave the forced ads on my space, and they provide that in 10 minuts ! A lot of web space and bandwith FREE!
they are great...
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by firstname.lastname@example.org, IP 203.142.76.X, When 02 Sep 08 : Rated= 9
the best freehost...!!!
000WebHost [FI](Inactive) reviewed by darvit, IP 75.190.251.X, When 02 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
I don't understand why other people are complaining of this host. I host my blog, a
school project site, three other friends' blogs, and a test Facebook app [unreleased] on
000webhost and they are all working well. The team is reasonable. They had a lot of
on ALL our files] but they are quick to listen to feedback and they clean up their act as
are all problem-free. This has been a very good host!
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by email@example.com, IP 201.246.121.X, When 02 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
this free host is the best !!!
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by firstname.lastname@example.org, IP 80.64.153.X, When 02 Sep 08 : Rated= 8
works everyday unlike other free hosters
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Anubis208, IP 76.10.81.X, When 01 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
Other than the limits, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this hosting. It is the best service I have ever used.
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by email@example.com, IP 203.142.76.X, When 01 Sep 08 : Rated= 9
It's good services. Actually i stil try and error. But so far I like LeadHoster very much.. Thanks for All..
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by chuck white, IP 71.60.35.X, When 01 Sep 08 : Rated= 10
I had been searching and searching for webhosters that wouldn't rack me mega bucks, while still offering the php, cgi and perl services.
That was about a year ago. I've been totally satisfied with them and haven't had a single complaint.
Thanks alot guys.
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Lora, IP 212.43.36.X, When 31 Aug 08 : Rated= 10
Very good site I really cannot understand how they give so much for free :)
FreeWebs [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Magnus, IP 88.12.172.X, When 31 Aug 08 : Rated= 2
This is not a good hosting service. 40 Mb is a very small space for a website I think, unless you want to make a small personal page. The only good thing is the online web editor, but nothing else. Beside, the comunity sucks. Is full of kids spamming and trolling, and the support is awfull. Better look for a nice webhosting.
10GBfreehost [FI](Inactive) reviewed by Magnus, IP 88.12.172.X, When 31 Aug 08 : Rated= 8
It's fine, but it's down today. Is slow sometimes and it has google ads at the bottom of the page and ads on some words, and the phpMy Admin is sloooooooooooooooow. I recomend to take a look to other hostings before joining this one.
LeadHoster [FI](Inactive) reviewed by raytfer, IP 202.93.37.X, When 31 Aug 08 : Rated= 9
Everything is great + no ads. Can't find any negative thing on this hosting service except for the filesize limit...